Archives /// Tim Lash
June 22nd, 2010
Opinion: Bits and pieces tactic masks the real goal of Landsowne plans
3 Comments
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="599" caption="Bank and Holmwood corner as seen in OSEG proposal"][/caption]
Editor's note: The following opinion piece by Tim Lash takes the form of an open letter to decision-makers and the general public in advance of the June 28 council vote on the OSEG proposal for the renewal of Lansdowne Park.
re: Visual Resources for Civic Lansdowne Decisions, and a Request
Dear Ottawa residents, councilors and mayoral candidates,
OSEG and City staff have split up their design and publicity about Lansdowne's future into separate parts: (1) the major part faced by Bank and Holmwood that would be given to OSEG for private development, (2) the stadium and Ottawa Civic Centre, (3) the remaining public space near the canal (which might include an "overlap" area north of the Aberdeen Pavilion).
The parts have been put forward out of sequence, partially, with shifting goal-posts and assumptions. The split hides the significance and impact of what would be given over to private development. It would be wrong to make a legal commitment on this basis. Please don’t.
To be right, Lansdowne has to be shown whole – what it is now, and what’s proposed. Only so can everyone concerned
• consult honestly and make civic decisions that are good socially, economically and environmentally
• plan and design coherently so objectives for Lansdowne Park are met in reality, and won't cancel each other out, or let one subvert another, and
• achieve a place that works with people’s surrounding activities, places, and facilities.
February 16th, 2010
Opinion: Lansdowne deadlines are illusory and artificial
1 Comment
[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1024" caption="Winter at Lansdowne: the season to gather opinion"][/caption]







